MastersThesis/thesis_output/presentation/slides/10_benchmark.html

<section data-chart="benchmark">
  <h2>Resultados: Benchmark Comparativo</h2>
  <div class="two-columns">
    <div class="chart-container">
      <canvas id="chartBenchmark"></canvas>
    </div>
    <div>
      <table class="data-table" style="font-size:0.62em;">
        <thead><tr><th>Motor</th><th>CER Base</th><th>CER HPO</th><th>Mejora</th><th>Trials &lt;2%</th></tr></thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr><td>EasyOCR</td><td>11.23%</td><td>5.84%</td><td>-48.0%</td><td>0/64</td></tr>
          <tr class="highlight"><td><strong>PaddleOCR</strong></td><td><strong>7.76%</strong></td><td><strong>0.79%</strong></td><td><strong>-89.8%</strong></td><td><strong>43/64</strong></td></tr>
          <tr><td>DocTR</td><td>12.06%</td><td>7.43%</td><td>-38.4%</td><td>0/64</td></tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <div class="highlight-box" style="font-size:0.6em; margin-top:12px;">
        <strong>HPO beneficia a todos los motores</strong>, pero solo PaddleOCR alcanza CER&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;2%. Su alta configurabilidad permite una mejora del 89.8% frente al 48% (EasyOCR) y 38.4% (DocTR).
      </div>
    </div>
  </div>
</section>